The plaintiffs filed a medical practice claim against the defendant physicians and hospital on behalf of the decedent due to the decedent suffering from a retroperitoneal hematoma while in the defendants’ care. The court held: that (1) the plaintiffs failed to comply with § 521-90a (a) because their opinion letter was authored by a physician certified in surgery, not internal medicine like the defendants; and (2) the exception in § 52-184c (c) was inapplicable as the plaintiffs’ failed to allege that the defendants acted outside the scope of internal medicine.
Related Posts:
Connecticut Personal Injury Notice Laws
This post deals with Connecticut Personal Injury Notice Laws. When should I see a lawyer? Can I resolve this myself?
What to Do Following a Glastonbury Burn Injury
Burn injuries can be severe and lead to long-term effects. Some of the common causes of burns are fire, chemicals,
Legal Aspects of Traumatic Brain Injury Cases in Manchester
Catastrophic injuries are always going to be a concern, especially for those who are engaged in strenuous physical
Glastonbury Car Accident Damages
An auto collision can cause significant injuries and property damage. The expenses incurred by these damages are often