The plaintiff brought this case forward seeking damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of a defective product. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant’s product, a spinal system used in the plaintiff’s spinal surgery, was defective and fractured after being implanted, causing the plaintiff to need to undergo a second surgery. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s products were defective and lacked adequate warnings. In response, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgement on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to produce a witness to testify regarding the alleged product defects. The defendant further noted that the plaintiff was barred from bringing their failure to warn claim under the learned intermediary doctrine. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgement. The plaintiff appealed.
Related Posts:
Connecticut Personal Injury Notice Laws
This post deals with Connecticut Personal Injury Notice Laws. When should I see a lawyer? Can I resolve this myself?
What to Do Following a Glastonbury Burn Injury
Burn injuries can be severe and lead to long-term effects. Some of the common causes of burns are fire, chemicals,
Legal Aspects of Traumatic Brain Injury Cases in Manchester
Catastrophic injuries are always going to be a concern, especially for those who are engaged in strenuous physical
Glastonbury Car Accident Damages
An auto collision can cause significant injuries and property damage. The expenses incurred by these damages are often