Plaintiff, the executor of his wife’s estate, sought damages from the defendant alleging that the cigarettes manufactured by the defendant were defectively designed and this defective design was responsible for the decedent’s cancer and death. The court declined to adopt the Restatement (Third) standard in favor of the dual tests based on § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts. Further, it held that although all product liability claims require proof of a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer, unreasonably dangerous is not determined by consumer expectations under comment (i) to § 402A when such a claim is brought under a theory of negligence. Lastly, it held that statutory punitive damages are not measured by Connecticut’s common-law punitive damages rule.
Related Posts:
Connecticut Personal Injury Notice Laws
This post deals with Connecticut Personal Injury Notice Laws. When should I see a lawyer? Can I resolve this myself?
What to Do Following a Glastonbury Burn Injury
Burn injuries can be severe and lead to long-term effects. Some of the common causes of burns are fire, chemicals,
Legal Aspects of Traumatic Brain Injury Cases in Manchester
Catastrophic injuries are always going to be a concern, especially for those who are engaged in strenuous physical
Glastonbury Car Accident Damages
An auto collision can cause significant injuries and property damage. The expenses incurred by these damages are often